Cerrar Menú Blogs
Las opiniones de los blogueros son de su estricta responsabilidad y no representan la opinión de este portal.
Profile image

Ingresa o regístrate acá para seguir este blog.

Seguir este blog

(Click here for an audio version of this blog entry.)
In my previous blog entry, I wrote about the possibility of the current cold war between China and the US heating up and how it could bring biological warfare to a new, devastating level.

In light of the deep ideological differences between the two superpowers coupled with the almost daily jibes being exchanged, it’s not that difficult to imagine a casus belli. A more optimistic take is that, as was the case for Cold War l, while they might reach the precipice, neither side will take the plunge to destruction. Not directly anyway.


The front line of today’s war; nobody is safe. (Photo by Andri from pexels.com.)

Waging cyberwar
The USSR-US stand-off was characterised by many proxy wars — Latin America saw its fair share of bloodshed in this regard — so at the very least we can expect something similar in Cold War II. Again, though, the shape of them will most likely be quite different from the battles fought in the 20th century.

In fact, electoral interference by Russian actors, state-sponsored as it is seen to be, gives us an idea of the clandestine proxy conflicts to come. Rather than directly or indirectly fight each other, the belligerents will attempt to deepen divides in enemy territory to fuel ongoing internal strife and instability. War on the cheap for the instigator. It’s also relatively low-risk with potentially high rewards.

In the US particularly, from the outside looking in, it appears not merely a case of the seeds for division having been planted, they’ve sprouted and are already in bloom in many respects, thanks in no small part to the media. For pretty much every issue, consensus is out, contestation is in. An insignificant spark is all that’s needed to set off the warring factions.

The media, both traditional and new-age, amplify any divisions by a considerable amount, while in some instances they create them where none really exist. On the ground, the differences are often much less pronounced than they are made out to be. This gives some cause for hope. (Take a week’s break from Facebook, Twitter and the media in general and there’s a big chance you’ll become more relaxed.)

Be that as it may, two-form media manipulation is as strong as it’s ever been. There’s manipulation of the media itself by outside forces as well as the media’s own malignant influence on the people it speaks to.

On the first of those, in terms of superpower conflict, we’re already in a hot war and have been for some time. From a Western perspective, this is relayed to us, as mentioned above, in terms of Russian interference. No doubt it’s a two-way street, perhaps done more overtly than covertly by the West, as in public denunciations of the dirty tactics from conniving Eastern powers, while at the same time, we must assume, playing them at their own game.

‘At this remove, the thinking must be that the West can be crushed by the very things it holds dear — its open society and liberalism.’

However, considering the more muzzled media in the likes of China and Russia compared to the West, interference by the latter on the former in this sphere is unlikely to be too effective.

Now the fact that we hear dissenting voices and have verbal battles over the best course of action for a given situation is in itself not a bad thing. It’s what liberal democracies with a free (in name anyway) press are all about. In “normal” times, this works fairly well.

Problems arise when our leaders look to unite the citizens behind a cause, especially an emotive one that is, literally, a question of life or death. This is what we’re seeing right now with coronavirus. The divide it has created brings to mind the old aphorism, ‘One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.’

Comedown from a liberal high
In one sense, it’s an inevitable product of an open, literate society replete with multiple sources of information available to the masses. If we lived under an authoritarian regime there would really only be one narrative. Thankfully, we’re not subject to that — yet.

Moreover, deciphering what is #FakeNews from genuine information isn’t easy in this particular conflict. There isn’t even agreement amongst those best qualified to speak on the matter, so little wonder many lay folk, Google at hand, have serious doubts about debatable decisions being taken for ‘our own health and well-being’.

As I wrote about previously, the approach to dealing with coronavirus isn’t a simple black-and-white issue. It’s not, as some like to make it out to be, a dollars-versus-lives decision. It’s fair to say most agree that measures taken to stop coronavirus at all costs, to prevent premature deaths due to the virus in the here and now will have knock-on, adverse effects for some time to come.

Thus, while we can unite behind this common microscopic enemy to the extent that pretty much everybody wants it to go away — or, in the likelihood that it doesn’t disappear any time soon, that it becomes less a burden on us than it currently is — we’re far from united on how best to achieve this. (With such differences of opinion it’s easy to understand why controlling the flow of information becomes such an attractive option for those in power.)

We can only assume that this makes for pleasant viewing for the monolithic systems in Beijing and, to a lesser extent, Moscow. At this remove, the thinking must be that the West can be crushed by the very things it holds dear — its open society and liberalism.

So have we given our worker ants access to too much information to the point that they’re now harming the system itself? Answering in the affirmative, it can be said we’ve already reached peak liberalism and operating at such heights has made us lightheaded. It’s far from clear as to the best route down to a safer level, if one exists that is.
Listen to Wrong Way’s Colombia Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz “The Bogotá Pub Quiz”.

(Visited 250 times, 1 visits today)
Profile image

La vida en Colombia desde la perspectiva de un periodista y locutor irlandés, quien ha vivido en el país desde 2011. El blog explora temas sociales y culturales, interacción con los nativos, viajes, actualidades y mucho más. Escucha su podcast acá: https://anchor.fm/brendan-corrigan.

Más posts de este Blog

Ver más

Lo más leído en Blogs


Mañana y tarde              Jon Fosse(...)


Quédense conmigo en esta noticia porque realmente me parece que tiene(...)


Atreverse a afirmar que el retumbante estribillo de '¡Fuera Petro, Fuera(...)

4 Comentarios
Ingresa aquí para que puedas comentar este post
  1. Yes, this is a new kind of warfare. Inspired by Chinese thought, something as small as a virus can bring the West down. The Chinese have studied their rival and know that USA is an individualistic society with a poor health system. This economic-biologic war leaves a loser, the West. And a winner, the Chinese economy. West don’t need to respond! . Chira will implode. No authoritarian regime that ambitions its growth to the detriment of neighboring countries or its own people has survived.

  2. jaimetorres0930

    Twice this week I watched CCTV4. Perhaps it was coincidence, but both times there were war images. The first time, military exercises with live ammunition. The second, rockets. I don’t understand Mandarin, though, so who knows

Reglamento de comentarios

ETCE no se responsabiliza por el uso y tratamiento que los usuarios le den a la información publicada en este espacio de recomendaciones, pero aclara que busca ser la sombrilla de un espacio donde el equilibrio y la tolerancia sean el eje. En ese camino, disponemos de total libertad para eliminar los contenidos que:

  1. Promuevan mensajes tipo spam.
  2. El odio ante una persona o comunidad por su condición social, racial, sexual, religiosa o de situación de discapacidad.
  3. Muestren o impulsen comportamientos o lenguajes sexualmente explícitos, violentos o dañinos.
  4. Vulneren o atenten contra los derechos de los menores de edad.

Además, tenga en cuenta que:

  • - El usuario registrado solo podrá hacer un voto y veto por comentario.
¿Encontraste un error?

Para EL TIEMPO las observaciones sobre su contenido son importantes. Permítenos conocerlas para, si es el caso, tomar los correctivos necesarios, o darle trámite ante las instancias pertinentes dentro de EL TIEMPO Casa Editorial.

Debes escribir el comentario
¡Gracias! Tu comentario ha sido guardado
Tu calificación ha sido registrada
Tu participación ya fue registrada
Haz tu reporte
Debes escribir tu reporte
Tu reporte ha sido enviado con éxito
Debes ser usuario registrado para poder reportar este comentario. Cerrar