Cerrar Menú Blogs
Las opiniones de los blogueros son de su estricta responsabilidad y no representan la opinión de este portal.
Profile image

Ingresa o regístrate acá para seguir este blog.

Seguir este blog

@wwaycorrigan

[Listen to an audio version of this blog entry here.]

‘I’m sorry, but we can’t accept that photocopy of your ID.’
‘Eh, why not? It’s legible, isn’t it?’
‘Oh, it is, it’s just it has to be enlarged to 150 per cent of its actual size.’
‘But why?’
‘Those are the rules, Sir. It’s just the way it is.’

The just-how-it-is society by Brendan Corrigan

‘Don’t ask questions, just follow the “rules”.’

Anyone who has ever had to do official business in Colombia over the years will relate to the above. There’s this fastidiousness, or at least there had been, about having photocopies of documents set to a specific size.

No doubt there was some valid reason for this when it was first introduced but few — if anybody — appear to know what that reason is now. Yet, I believe, it’s still a requirement in some places.

A price for pay
Such occurrences are far from unique to these parts. Across the world, there are procedures that “must be” followed yet when one asks why this or that is the case, hardly anyone knows the reason. Basically, they’ve become customary and nobody bothers to question them.

Government bodies tend to be the worst culprits (the following satirical video gives a good idea of this, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYcZc62Gf6w) but it happens elsewhere, too.

The one that always bemuses me is the need to supply paymasters with a certificate issued by my bank stating that the account exists and is genuine. Why on earth would I not give details of an active, “real” account when I want to receive money owed to me for services rendered?

I’ve heard it said that this is to prove that I am the account holder. OK, but what business is it of those paying me where the money goes, particularly when we’re talking about private individuals? Maybe, on the odd occasion, I’d like the money sent to one of my barrio buddies (at least that way there’d be a paper record of these frequent loans I give).

‘Whatever we’re doing or following may indeed be broken or causing harm and we don’t realise it.’

I’ve also been told that this payment protocol is done to cut out money laundering. I’m not sure how it manages to do that exactly.

Mentioning payments, there is a tendency in the largely toxic TV and film industry here to pay contractors a minimum of 90 days after work has been done. Again, when you ask why this is, you get the standard retort: ‘It’s just how it is.’

What would happen if I took the same line with paying my bills? Well, I’ve actually a very good idea of what the consequences are — see my previous post, Grupo Vanti’s vanity: ‘The customer is rarely right’, for more on that.

We are, though, creatures of habit and routine. And if everything seems to be just fine, we’ll stick to it: The if-it-ain’t-broke-don’t-fix-it approach. The problem is, whatever we’re doing or following may indeed be broken or causing harm and we don’t realise it.

Fishy feeling
Take people’s approach to eating. We’ve been conditioned, particularly since the Industrial Revolution, into believing that we must eat at least three substantial meals in a 12-hour period or so. With the sedentary lifestyles many lead these days, they’d most likely get by on just one decent dish a day, if that’s even needed.

We do, of course, face many challenges in rethinking our consumption habits. There’s a whole industry with lots of money, power and influence that wants us to eat, drink and be merry all the time. Then there’s an associated industry ready to ease the pain on our overfed bodies with even more addictive goodies.

What all this should lead to is plenty of food for thought. Alas, when it comes to critically thinking about what we’re doing, what we’re being asked to do and why we’re doing it many, literally, don’t give these considerations a second’s thought.

I’m reminded of a story of a family who used to cut raw, whole fish in a very particular, time-consuming way before frying it in the pan. Eventually, somebody questioned the practice. It was found that it started simply because a great-grandmother only had one very small pan to cook with, so she had to cut the fish the way she did.

This made perfect sense at the time and in the circumstances — in fact, it was necessary — but the reason for its continuance had long since passed.

So it can often pay off to rediscover that unceasing child inquisitiveness, to regularly ask ‘Why?’. With that, we might find that there’s little substance or sense behind much of what we’re being asked to do.
__________________________________________________________
Listen to Wrong Way’s Colombia Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz “The Bogotá Pub Quiz”.

(Visited 50 times, 1 visits today)
PERFIL
Profile image

La vida en Colombia desde la perspectiva de un periodista y locutor irlandés, quien ha vivido en el país desde 2011. El blog explora temas sociales y culturales, interacción con los nativos, viajes, actualidades y mucho más. Escucha su podcast acá: https://anchor.fm/brendan-corrigan.

Más posts de este Blog

Ver más

Lo más leído en Blogs

1

Su perfecta mezcla de estilo, innovación e ingeniería le han permitido(...)

2

Técnicas para la comunicación asertiva - Claudia Palacios Listen to "#237(...)

3

Con los atardeceres multicolor que se han visto estas semanas en(...)

0 Comentarios
Ingresa aquí para que puedas comentar este post
Reglamento de comentarios

ETCE no se responsabiliza por el uso y tratamiento que los usuarios le den a la información publicada en este espacio de recomendaciones, pero aclara que busca ser la sombrilla de un espacio donde el equilibrio y la tolerancia sean el eje. En ese camino, disponemos de total libertad para eliminar los contenidos que:

  1. Promuevan mensajes tipo spam.
  2. El odio ante una persona o comunidad por su condición social, racial, sexual, religiosa o de situación de discapacidad.
  3. Muestren o impulsen comportamientos o lenguajes sexualmente explícitos, violentos o dañinos.
  4. Vulneren o atenten contra los derechos de los menores de edad.

Además, tenga en cuenta que:

  • - El usuario registrado solo podrá hacer un voto y veto por comentario.
Aceptar
¿Encontraste un error?

Para EL TIEMPO las observaciones sobre su contenido son importantes. Permítenos conocerlas para, si es el caso, tomar los correctivos necesarios, o darle trámite ante las instancias pertinentes dentro de EL TIEMPO Casa Editorial.


Debes escribir el comentario
¡Gracias! Tu comentario ha sido guardado
Tu calificación ha sido registrada
Tu participación ya fue registrada
Haz tu reporte
Cerrar
Debes escribir tu reporte
Tu reporte ha sido enviado con éxito
Debes ser usuario registrado para poder reportar este comentario. Cerrar