Cerrar Menú Blogs
Las opiniones de los blogueros son de su estricta responsabilidad y no representan la opinión de este portal.
Profile image

Ingresa o regístrate acá para seguir este blog.

Seguir este blog

@wwaycorrigan

[Listen to an audio version of this blog entry here.]

A few weeks ago on BBC Radio 2’s Jeremy Vine Show, there was a discussion about lifelong singletons.

Set on singlehood: Splendid isolation around Gachetá, Cundinamarca, Colombia; having a partner would just ruin it!

Better off alone? For the moment, yes!

Considering my relationship status and general outlook, the topic piqued my interest.

Not in it to win it
While there were few nuggets of wisdom from the “expert” contributor and various callers, I certainly could resonate with the observation that non-single folk tend to make assumptions about those of us going it alone.

Chief among them is the questioning of one’s sexuality. Regardless of sexual preference, the idea that an individual might be simply content not to be hooked up or constantly playing the dating game appears to be unthinkable for some. ‘There must be something deeper at play.’ Or so it goes.

For me, the main reason I’m single — in terms of things that are within my control in any case — is that I find dating a tedious affair. Thus, if one isn’t really playing the game then one can hardly expect to “win” it.

OK, I do dabble in some dating apps, mostly out of boredom and curiosity, and I do get matches. Yet, even if the initial conversation is promising, I usually lose interest very quickly.

‘Here in Colombia, if any potential suitor were happy for the wining and dining to take place in my beloved barrios, then we might be on to a winner. Alas, very few appear up for that.’

Obviously, the idea is to arrange an actual physical meeting but, based on previous form, I generally come to the conclusion that it’ll be a waste of time and money. Once bitten and all that (see, for one, https://wwcorrigan.blogspot.com/2017/05/a-prostitute-by-any-other-name.html).

People may point to the frequently cited “commitment issues”. That might be a factor yet, like in anything, one wants to see some potential in the “project” before committing.

It must be noted that my current location plays a part in all this, too. I live fairly frugally in a country where many women — the ones I often meet anyway — expect the man to lavishly wine and dine them from the get-go. And to do so indefinitely.

For sure, bringing it back to basics for a moment, the male of the species in the majority of cases has to do much of the initial wooing. The task is to convince the female that he has the right attributes to father offspring. As advanced as we Homo sapiens are — some of us anyway — these instincts are still at play, even if procreation is not the desired goal.

In modern times, this generally means financial security, a solid career, popularity, reliability and such like, regardless of the country.

Foreign woes
Here in Colombia, if any potential suitor were happy for the aforementioned wining and dining to take place in my beloved barrios (see https://wwcorrigan.blogspot.com/2021/08/bogotas-perpetual-corner-bar-barrio.html), then we might be on to a winner. Alas, very few appear up for that.

This isn’t to say that available women don’t frequent these barrios. Of course they do. It’s just many of them, from my observations, prefer to stick to their own tribe, particularly so when they realise the “exotic” foreigner is not as wealthy as their preconceptions had led them to believe. ‘You’re not loaded, you don’t dance. Next.’

Therefore, I might actually have a better chance of finding a relationship companion in a country with less inequality. That’s the theory in any case.

In one aspect, however, having a partner in Colombia could potentially save me money. Or at least save me from entering into risky compromises. I could use it as a reason to refuse these regular loans I’ve been giving out over the last few years (see https://wwcorrigan.blogspot.com/2021/10/the-barrio-banker.html). ‘Sorry, marica, but I’ve no money left to lend, I’ve spent it all on the missus.’ Something to that effect.

Do I see myself being a lifelong singleton? Well, I’m no clairvoyant but the 19 years of adulthood I’ve had thus far suggest the safer bet is to be on the yes side of that question. And, as alluded to, I’m not desperately trying to change my current relationship status.

Nonetheless, one never truly knows what the future holds.
_______________________________________________________________
Listen to Wrong Way’s Colombia Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz “The Bogotá Pub Quiz”.

(Visited 84 times, 1 visits today)
PERFIL
Profile image

La vida en Colombia desde la perspectiva de un periodista y locutor irlandés, quien ha vivido en el país desde 2011. El blog explora temas sociales y culturales, interacción con los nativos, viajes, actualidades y mucho más. Escucha su podcast acá: https://anchor.fm/brendan-corrigan.

Más posts de este Blog

  • Opinión

    A pet hate

    @wwaycorrigan [For an audio/vlog version of this story, click here.] A farmer's work is never done. Be it tillage(...)

  • Colombia

    San Juan de Rioseco: Only its river runs (almost!) dry

    @wwaycorrigan [For an audio/vlog version of this story, click here.] When travelling in Colombia, one is best not to(...)

  • Opinión

    Boosting dental health

    @wwaycorrigan [For an audio/vlog version of this story, click here.] A nuclear war. A devastating earthquake. Severe floods. England(...)

  • Opinión

    Merging a life vacation with a vocation

    @wwaycorrigan [For an audio/vlog version of this story, click here.] 'When men choose not to believe in God, they(...)

Ver más

Lo más leído en Blogs

1

¿Casa-logía?    Uno es lo que es. A los 15 años(...)

2

“Las personas más felices son las que están ocupadas, porque sus(...)

3

Poco se habla sobre el Jardín Botánico de Bogotá, y esta(...)

0 Comentarios
Ingresa aquí para que puedas comentar este post
Reglamento de comentarios

ETCE no se responsabiliza por el uso y tratamiento que los usuarios le den a la información publicada en este espacio de recomendaciones, pero aclara que busca ser la sombrilla de un espacio donde el equilibrio y la tolerancia sean el eje. En ese camino, disponemos de total libertad para eliminar los contenidos que:

  1. Promuevan mensajes tipo spam.
  2. El odio ante una persona o comunidad por su condición social, racial, sexual, religiosa o de situación de discapacidad.
  3. Muestren o impulsen comportamientos o lenguajes sexualmente explícitos, violentos o dañinos.
  4. Vulneren o atenten contra los derechos de los menores de edad.

Además, tenga en cuenta que:

  • - El usuario registrado solo podrá hacer un voto y veto por comentario.
Aceptar
¿Encontraste un error?

Para EL TIEMPO las observaciones sobre su contenido son importantes. Permítenos conocerlas para, si es el caso, tomar los correctivos necesarios, o darle trámite ante las instancias pertinentes dentro de EL TIEMPO Casa Editorial.


Debes escribir el comentario
¡Gracias! Tu comentario ha sido guardado
Tu calificación ha sido registrada
Tu participación ya fue registrada
Haz tu reporte
Cerrar
Debes escribir tu reporte
Tu reporte ha sido enviado con éxito
Debes ser usuario registrado para poder reportar este comentario. Cerrar