Cerrar Menú Blogs
Las opiniones de los blogueros son de su estricta responsabilidad y no representan la opinión de este portal.
Profile image

Ingresa o regístrate acá para seguir este blog.

Seguir este blog

@radiobrendan
Wanted: Enthusiastic people to take anything from six to 24 hours out of their day (with the ‘promise’ of more days to come), be ordered around like dogs when needed, virtually walked over when not. Food may or may not be included, it depends on how the employers feel. Same goes for payment.

‘Any takers? Eh, no thank you! But it’s for television.’ ‘Me!’ ‘Me!’ ‘Me!’ ‘Me!’ ‘Me!’

Ah yes, what some of us ‘little people’ will put ourselves through just to get on television. The lure of the camera makes certain folk lose all perspective.

Arrependitos, National Geographic.

Angry cops (especially when they don’t get paid sufficiently) …

Some are what we call ‘media whores’, those who stop at nothing to get a bit of exposure. It’s a tad off the mark to actually call them ‘whores’, as a lot of the time they’re happy to prostitute themselves out to the media lords for free.

The thinking behind this is that the ‘nobody’ will become a ‘somebody’, thereby reaching a position where they can demand payment (for example, Bart Simpson, accidental as it was, as the ‘I didn’t do it kid’ and more recently all those seeking fame and ‘recognition’ via YouTube).

Others aren’t quite as, um, ‘in your face’ or driven as the above, but they still get weak at the knees when the chance to be on TV comes along.

Thus, with an amount of people acting in such a subservient manner towards the TV gods, it’s little wonder that the industry’s powers-that-be take advantage of the situation. Why pay people for something that they’ll willingly do for free, or practically for free anyway?

In countries such as Colombia, this mentality appears worse than in more, let’s say affluent places. There are a number of factors at play in this.

Firstly, for outside productions, which predominantly come from the USA, the costs of filming here are generally cheaper. Wage demands for personnel hired on location, those used both on and off screen, are much lower than the country of origin. No big surprise there, the cost of living in Colombia is lower (for most) after all.

Then we’ve locals with next to nothing in terms of income and future prospects, so any sort of ‘easy money’ they can make is taken, understandably, without question. There’s also the steady stream of backpackers passing through the country who jump at the chance to do some ‘glamorous’ extras work, regardless of pay.

On top of all this you’ve a host of greedy agents, all trying to pocket as much as they can from the people they send to film.

Now the argument can be made that the payments offered are fine in a Colombian context. Again, it depends on how you look at it, where you come from and what exactly you’re being asked to do. For one, in terms of basic extra work, foreigners tend to be paid better than locals, receiving up to five times more.

When it comes to landing speaking parts, some agencies pay little better than what they give extras. The problem here is that landing even just a small role can rule you out of working on that production again, unlike being a standard extra. What’s more, you generally have to go to castings and learn lines for these more prominent parts.

Narcos, Series Two.

‘Actors’ on the cheap …

For example, I was paid 180,000 Colombian pesos (less than 60 euros) for my little speaking part in Narcos II, practically the same as extras pay. It now appears I can’t be in Narcos again, so from a monetary point of view I was robbed (for the record, other agencies offer at least 500,000 Colombian pesos for speaking parts).

Considering the amount of money the likes of Fox, Netflix and Univsion — to name but a few of the companies that film in Colombia — have in their coffers, there’s no reason why they can’t be more financially generous to those at the bottom rung.

That they’re not may be more to do with the agencies on the ground than the production companies themselves. The former are doing their bit in maintaining and deepening the gap between rich and poor. They’re certainly not doing us any favours, despite what they might like us to think.

Some of us poorer folk are not only happy to let all this happen, we help them along the way as well. Hey, it’s all-powerful TV after all; thou shalt not question its wisdom.
_____________________________________________
Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan – The Blog & IQuiz «The Bogotá Pub Quiz».

(Visited 286 times, 1 visits today)
PERFIL
Profile image

La vida en Colombia desde la perspectiva de un periodista y locutor Irlandés, quien ha estado viviendo en el país desde 2011. El blog explora temas sociales y cultura, interacción con los nativos, viajes, actualidades y mucho más. Escucha su podcast acá: https://www.spreaker.com/show/the-colombia-cast.

Más posts de este Blog

  • Bogotá

    Bogotá's lax lockdown

    @wwaycorrigan There's been a lot of frustration expressed on social media about the world's longest coronavirus-induced lockdown. [caption id="attachment_4430"(...)

  • Colombia

    Coronavirus conspiracies

    @wwaycorrigan Very few things in life are simple black and white affairs, not even Black Lives Matter. And certainly(...)

  • Colombia

    Colombia, not up to the Covid test

    @wwaycorrigan In a classic episode of The Simpsons — in its heyday — a temporarily housebound Bart suspects that(...)

  • Colombia

    A Colombian account with interest

    @wwaycorrigan Ignorantia juris non excusat. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. 'It's your fault, buddy, if you didn't(...)

Ver más

Lo más leído en Blogs

1

La revista SoHo se despide de su edición impresa. Publicaciones Semana(...)

2

Se ha hablado mucho de que los títulos de las películas(...)

3

Dios nos habla por medio de nuestros sueños. Esta es una(...)

1 Comentarios
Ingresa aquí para que puedas comentar este post
  1. Colombia’s foreign press clampdown? | Blogs El Tiempo

    […] example, I have dabbled in a bit of acting, basic and ad hoc as it has been. So what if I were to apply for a visa as an actor? I don’t […]

Reglamento de comentarios

ETCE no se responsabiliza por el uso y tratamiento que los usuarios le den a la información publicada en este espacio de recomendaciones, pero aclara que busca ser la sombrilla de un espacio donde el equilibrio y la tolerancia sean el eje. En ese camino, disponemos de total libertad para eliminar los contenidos que:

  1. Promuevan mensajes tipo spam.
  2. El odio ante una persona o comunidad por su condición social, racial, sexual, religiosa o de situación de discapacidad.
  3. Muestren o impulsen comportamientos o lenguajes sexualmente explícitos, violentos o dañinos.
  4. Vulneren o atenten contra los derechos de los menores de edad.

Además, tenga en cuenta que:

  • - El usuario registrado solo podrá hacer un voto y veto por comentario.
Aceptar
¿Encontraste un error?

Para EL TIEMPO las observaciones sobre su contenido son importantes. Permítenos conocerlas para, si es el caso, tomar los correctivos necesarios, o darle trámite ante las instancias pertinentes dentro de EL TIEMPO Casa Editorial.


Debes escribir el comentario
¡Gracias! Tu comentario ha sido guardado
Tu calificación ha sido registrada
Tu participación ya fue registrada
Haz tu reporte
Cerrar
Debes escribir tu reporte
Tu reporte ha sido enviado con éxito
Debes ser usuario registrado para poder reportar este comentario. Cerrar